It’s an essential pillar of quality and safety control across many industries. Nondestructive Testing (NDT) detects defects in materials and components without damaging them.
Nondestructive Testing (NDT) is mission-critical in modern manufacturing: it safeguards quality and safety while helping offset cycle-time pressure, cost constraints, and skilled-labor shortages. In this article, you’ll get a clear definition of NDT, a concise overview of the most important methods, concrete selection criteria, guidance on integrating NDT into your production and IT landscape, the key standards, and an ROI perspective.
Nondestructive testing (NDT) comprises methods that reveal defects and irregularities in materials and components without permanently altering the test piece. The goal is to assess integrity, functionality, and dimensional accuracy under real operating conditions—providing robust evidence of quality and compliance.
Nondestructive vs. Destructive Testing
By contrast, destructive testing deliberately determines material properties and failure behavior by loading specimens to fracture (and beyond). It answers questions about strength, toughness, and fracture mechanisms—but renders the sample unusable.
Both approaches complement each other: NDT checks broadly and in operation whether each part meets specified limits and can be used immediately. Destructive tests create the basis for that by providing properties, thresholds, and models that guide NDT and support the development and validation of inspection concepts. In short, NDT answers “Is this specific part OK?” while destructive testing clarifies “How does the material behave in general—and why?”
Real-World Use
In practice, NDT can often be deployed inline or end-of-line as a 100% inspection, while destructive tests are typically sample-based, performed in the lab, and more time-consuming—yet indispensable for material selection, design, and failure analysis.
It’s especially advantageous when the integrity of materials, components, or entire assemblies can be verified withoutremoving or damaging them. That’s exactly what nondestructive testing (NDT) enables. Regular NDT inspections are the cornerstone of proactive maintenance and help ensure quality, safety, and asset availability in critical industries.
Rigorous NDT prevents catastrophic failures—from aircraft and locomotive damage to pipeline leaks and incidents in power plants and maritime operations. The result: lower risk, stronger compliance, and credible proof of safety.
NDT specialists ensure product integrity, steer production processes, cut manufacturing costs, and maintain consistently high quality. That pays off in first-pass yield, cycle times, and total cost per part.
NDT delivers measurable data and insights on condition, trends, and weak points. This makes optimization potential visible, boosts efficiency, and accelerates innovation across manufacturing and critical infrastructure.
The following nondestructive testing (NDT) methods are among the most widely used in industry—each with specific strengths for reliably detecting and assessing defects, cracks, and other irregularities in components and materials:
This includes eddy current testing (ECT), which uses electromagnetic induction to detect flaws in conductive materials. It’s widely used in aircraft maintenance and for thin-walled tubing.
Automation suitability: high
MT is used to detect surface and near-surface defects in ferromagnetic materials. The part is magnetized, and ferromagnetic particles reveal discontinuities.
PT reveals surface-breaking discontinuities in solid, non-porous materials. A penetrant seeps into cracks and cavities and is made visible under UV or white light.
RT uses X-rays or gamma rays to create images of internal structure. It’s commonly applied to castings, welds, and assemblies to detect internal defects.
Automation suitability: medium
UT uses high-frequency sound waves to detect surface and subsurface defects. It’s widely used on pressure vessels, machinery, and bridges.
Automation suitability: very high
In nondestructive testing (NDT), standards and qualifications underpin quality, safety, and traceability. They define whomay test, how testing must be performed, and under what conditions.
ISO 9712 – Qualification of NDT Personnel
Nondestructive testing (NDT) is governed by DIN EN ISO 9712 and may only be performed by certified personnel. Certification follows strict requirements to ensure quality and safety and is always method-specific. Example: someone certified only for Ultrasonic Testing (UT) may not perform Radiographic Testing (RT) or Eddy Current Testing (ET).
ISO 9712 defines three certification levels:
Level 1: May perform tests according to written instructions and document the results.
Level 2: In addition, may interpret and evaluate results in accordance with standards and codes.
Level 3: May select the appropriate test method, define procedures, and assume overall responsibility for the testing organization.
Prerequisites include defined training hours, practical experience, and examinations (general/specific/practical). Certificates are typically valid for 5 years, followed by renewal (evidence of continued practice/vision acuity) and recertification on a longer cycle (typically after 10 years).
Importantly, employer authorization for specific tasks is required in addition to personal certification.
ISO/IEC 17025 & DAkkS – Accreditation of Testing and Calibration Laboratories
ISO/IEC 17025 demonstrates a laboratory’s technical competence and impartiality. For NDT service providers, this entails, among other things:
Traceability to SI units (e.g., via the Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt), determination of measurement uncertainty, and method validation
Quality management, qualified equipment/gauge capability, and proficiency testing (round-robin tests)
Regular assessments by the national accreditation body—DAkkS in Germany—as part of an ongoing surveillance and re-accreditation cycle
An ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation complements ISO 9001, but it is more technically rigorous and specifically focused on testing and calibration competence.
Product- and Acceptance Requirements – Industry-Specific Obligations
Depending on the product and industry, laws and standards define the scope and depth of NDT, for example:
Pressure Equipment Directive (PED) 2014/68/EU: Requires conformity assessment including NDT performed by qualified personnel in accordance with harmonized standards; type and extent (e.g., weld RT/UT, leak testing) depend on the hazard category and material.
Steel/metal construction (e.g., EN 1090), welding (EN ISO 17635, ISO 5817), pipelines/pressure vessels (EN series), or ASME codes outside the EU: Specify acceptance levels and evaluation criteria.
ISO 9712 defines who is authorized to test, ISO/IEC 17025 establishes with what demonstrable competence and traceability testing must be performed, and product/acceptance specifications dictate what must be tested, how intensively, and against which limits. Together, they create a seamless framework for quality, safety, and compliancein NDT.
Nondestructive testing is cost-effective because it detects quality issues early and increases the safety of products and assets. This prevents failures, complaints, and costly replacements—reducing total cost of ownership. In series production, NDT is especially efficient: inspections are fast and repeatable, parts remain undamaged, and can be processed further immediately.
Cost-efficient inspection is critical for every company—after all, nondestructive testing (NDT) is meant to make production more efficient. At its core, there are three cost levers:
Automation
NDT cost efficiency is driven largely by the degree of automation. More robotics, inspection systems, and AI evaluation (e.g., Automated Optical Inspection) mean fewer manual steps and fewer misjudgments. This significantly lowers cost per part while reducing the risk of errors thanks to repeatable, documented findings.
Detection accuracy
High detection accuracy prevents both false rejects and escapes. In automated systems, this depends on clean data and a clearly defined evaluation logic. High-quality test equipment and sensors—stable lighting/optics and reference standards—also reduce variation and misclassification. Where inspections are manual, DIN EN ISO 9712 qualifications are decisive: the right certification level (1–3), training, and precise work instructions minimize interpretation errors.
Cycle time
Cycle time is equally crucial. If inspections run at line speed, there’s no need for additional inspection lines that would consume extra resources.
Early detection cuts scrap and rework, saving material, time, and budget. NDT stops defective parts early—before they lead to failures, recalls, or costly repairs.
Early detection cuts scrap and rework, saving material, time, and budget.
Proven quality and integrity of components and structures reduce accident risk, protecting people and the environment.
Condition data from NDT enable planned, preventive servicing and help prevent unplanned downtime.
Companies often face a make-or-buy decision in ZfP/NDT—choosing between in-house development, a partner solution, as-a-service, or an external testing provider.
In-house development
Building your own (software and equipment) gives you maximum control and a solution perfectly tailored to your process. The trade-offs: high CapEx, longer time-to-value, and added project/integration risk.
Partner solution
Working with partners (e.g., system integrators) is typically faster and requires less internal effort than building in-house, but it often remains investment-driven. It can also create dependencies when changes are needed later.
As-a-service
This model shifts investment (CapEx) to predictable OpEx and substantially reduces project risk. Billing is typically KPI-based (e.g., cycle time, detection accuracy, false-call rate), tying payment to actual performance and making scaling straightforward and low-risk.
External testing providers
Testing service providers eliminate capital investment and offer specialized methods within an ISO/IEC 17025–compliant environment. They’re ideal for ramp-ups, peak loads, or acceptance testing—but for inline series production, logistics and lead time often make them only a partial fit.
In practice, a hybrid approach often wins out: takt-critical series inspections run in-house—ideally in an as-a-servicemodel with no CapEx—while specialized or acceptance tests are outsourced. This combines fast cycle times with low risk and maximum flexibility.
Nondestructive tests only deliver reliable results when conditions, evaluation, and method are well aligned.
Conditions: Material and geometry
NDT isn’t a magic magnifier—it’s only as good as the setup. Material and surface (rough, coated, ferromagnetic) as well as geometry and accessibility (edges, cavities) have a noticeable impact on reliability. Add safety considerations, especially for Radiographic Testing (RT) with shielding and radiation protection. Feasibility studies and sample parts during planning help quantify these influences realistically.
Evaluation
Evaluation is the next pitfall: an indication is not automatically a defect. Without training, clear acceptance rules, and supervision, misinterpretation can occur—leading to unnecessary scrap or overlooked risks. AI-assisted evaluation (NDT 4.0) can reduce human subjectivity and ensure repeatable results.
Physical limits
Every method has physical limits: Eddy Current Testing (ET) penetrates only to limited depth; RT hits constraints with large wall thicknesses (time, dose, contrast); Ultrasonic Testing (UT) needs good coupling and suitable sound paths. These boundary conditions are integral to NDT and should be spelled out in specifications and contracts so expectations and results align.
The answer is risk-based planning and smart combinations: secure the surface with VT/PT/MT, and check the volume with UT/RT—tailored to the part, likely defect locations, and takt time. This builds robust NDT inspection chains that make reliable decisions despite inherent limits. The key is to lock in inspection objectives, acceptance limits, and cycle time early—and validate the chain on real sample parts.
The value of nondestructive testing (NDT) lies in its contribution to safety, cost efficiency, and reliable documentation. With automation and rigorous standards compliance, it becomes a scalable default—especially in series production.
A smart approach includes risk-based method selection, personnel qualification to DIN EN ISO 9712, and a solid data strategy for evaluation, traceability, and continuous improvement. It’s also worth assessing whether AI-assisted evaluation and automation add extra value (e.g., fewer false rejects, better scalability).
Discover how easy it is to solve a wide range of inspection tasks with Maddox AI.
Discover Maddox AI software
We are ISO 27001 certified.
